Dunham v. Ware Savings Bank
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.
The facts of this case are simple, but it will likely have significant impact upon many transactions involving the sale of real property. We decide a question recently presented to a number of courts in the United States, namely, whether the enforcement of a so called “due-on-sale” clause 3 in a home mortgage constitutes an unreasonable restraint on alienation in the absence of allegations of impairment to the security. A due-on-sale clause is a device commonly used in real property security transactions to provide, at the option of the lender, for acceleration of the maturity of the loan…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sonny Arnold, Inc. v. Sentry Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Toledo v. Perry's Landing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- First Nat. Bank of Vicksburg v. CaruthersMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
- Olean v. TregliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Andover Savings Bank v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.