Legal Opinion

City of Xenia v. Wallace

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1988No. 87-571PublishedCited by 342 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtH. Brown, J.

The conflict between the appellate courts centers around which party has the burden of going forward with evidence to show probable cause, or lack thereof, for the administration of a breathalyzer test. We hold that the state has the burden of going forward with evidence to show probable cause once the defendant has demonstrated a warrantless search or seizure and has raised lack of probable cause as a ground for attacking the legality of the search or seizure.

I

The burden of initially establishing whether a search or seizure was authorized by a warrant is on the party challenging the legality…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. Bonifacio De La Fuente, Ronald Albert Cardenas, George Sierra, Pat Vargas,augie D. Sierra, and Robert StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. People v. LylesIllinois Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by342 opinions

  1. State v. MedcalfOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Welsh-Huggins v. Jefferson Cty. Prosecutor's Office (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. NieldsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. ShindlerOhio Supreme Court · 1994

337 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API