Legal Opinion

State v. Keene

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1998No. 96-2455PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

R.C. 2929.05(A) requires us to undertake a three-part analysis of capital cases. First, we must review the specific issues raised by the appellant with respect to the proceedings below “in the same manner that [we] review other criminal cases.” Second, we must independently weigh the aggravating circumstances found by the trier of fact against the mitigating factors existing in the case. Finally, we must consider whether the sentence of death is disproportionate to penalties imposed in similar cases.

In this appeal, appellant raises twenty-six propositions of law. Finding that none of these…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 2004

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API