Legal Opinion

Syvertson v. Butler

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1906No. Civ. No. 176PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Pringle & Pringle, and Lawler, Allen & Van Dyke, for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Appeal by defendants Pearl and Meda Mecartney, executrices of the estate of A. Mecartney, deceased, from a judgment rendered in favor of defendant Butler, upon a cross-complaint, against defendants appellants. The plaintiff commenced his action against defendant Butler and others, alleging his ownership and seisin in fee of certain described real estate. Defendant Butler answered, disclaiming any interest in the premises set out in the complaint, other than as to a single lot described, as to which she averred ownership and denied that plaintiff had any estate or interest therein. At the time…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ambassador Petroleum Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Nuckolls v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Thorpe v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Warner v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Main v. ThorntonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API