State ex rel. State Board of Medical Examiners v. Naifeh
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentOpala, Justice
The first-impression issue before us is whether the provisions of 59 O.S.1971 § 513 afford a constitutionally permissible barrier to a medical practitioner’s [physician’s] district court appeal for review, on the record, of an order by the Board of Medical Examiners [Board] which placed him on a two-year probation for “indiscriminate and excessive” prescribing of controlled dangerous substances. My resolution of this issue must be by a negative answer. Section 513, insofar as it appears to vest in this court, to the exclusion of the district court, reviewing power over the Board’s decisions,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 23, State Question No. 38Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Trask v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.