Legal Opinion

State ex rel. State Board of Medical Examiners v. Naifeh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 10, 1979No. 53615Published

1DissentOpala, Justice

The first-impression issue before us is whether the provisions of 59 O.S.1971 § 513 afford a constitutionally permissible barrier to a medical practitioner’s [physician’s] district court appeal for review, on the record, of an order by the Board of Medical Examiners [Board] which placed him on a two-year probation for “indiscriminate and excessive” prescribing of controlled dangerous substances. My resolution of this issue must be by a negative answer. Section 513, insofar as it appears to vest in this court, to the exclusion of the district court, reviewing power over the Board’s decisions,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 23, State Question No. 38Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Trask v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API