Legal Opinion

Trask v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 25, 1969No. 43009PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Judge.

In this original proceeding, the petitioners ask this court to issue, to the respondent Judge of the District Court of Tulsa County, a writ of mandamus requiring him to hear their appeal from an order of the Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (concerning licenses theretofore issued by that board to the petitioners) by trial de novo, as required by 37 O.S.1961 § 531, which, in addition to authorizing such an appeal, provides that “Such appeal shall consist of a trial de novo.”

The respondent judge overruled the petitioners’ oral motion for a trial de novo, specifically…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seventeen Hundred Peoria, Inc. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Hemmer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. In Re Lewis'adoptionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Smith v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Crosbie v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Grand River Dam Authority v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Isbell v. STATE, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. LOCKETT v. EVANSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  4. Robbins v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Baggett v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API