Protect Our Benefits v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEEDHAM, J.
Since 1996, retired employees of the City and County of San Francisco (the City) have been eligible to receive a supplemental cost of living allowance (supplemental COLA) as part of their pension benefits when the retirement fund’s earnings from the previous year exceeded projected earnings. On November 8, 2011, City voters passed Proposition C, an initiative measure that, among other things, amended the charter of the City and County of San Francisco to condition the payment of the supplemental COLA on the retirement fund being “fully funded” based on the market value of…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marin Ass'n of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- King v. New York City Employees Retirement SystemDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Alameda County Deputy etc. v. Alameda County Employees' etc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- American Federation of State etc. Employees v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2025
- American Federation of State etc. Employees v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.