Legal Opinion

King v. New York City Employees Retirement System

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 25, 2016No. 13-CV-4730PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM, ORDER & JUDGMENT

Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge

Table of Contents

I. Introduction... 377

II. Plaintiffs Work History.. .379

III. Context: Public Pensions.. .379

*377A. Background.'. .379

B. Protections Afforded.. .379

1. Contractually Protected under State Law.. .380

2. Constitutionally Protected under State Law.. .380

3. Constitutionally Protected under Federal Law.. .380

IV. New York City’s Pension Scheme.. .380

V. Pension History of Plaintiff... 384

A. Tier 1 Status: 1971-1977.. .384

B. Tier 4 Status: 1984-2000.. .385

C. Application for Reinstatement to Tier 1…

2Cases cited67 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Davis v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Dukes v. N.Y.C. Employees' Ret. Sys.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Bennett v. New York State Thruway AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
  4. Einsohn v. The New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
  5. Furman v. RichDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API