King v. New York City Employees Retirement System
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM, ORDER & JUDGMENT
Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge
Table of Contents
I. Introduction... 377
II. Plaintiffs Work History.. .379
III. Context: Public Pensions.. .379
*377A. Background.'. .379
B. Protections Afforded.. .379
1. Contractually Protected under State Law.. .380
2. Constitutionally Protected under State Law.. .380
3. Constitutionally Protected under Federal Law.. .380
IV. New York City’s Pension Scheme.. .380
V. Pension History of Plaintiff... 384
A. Tier 1 Status: 1971-1977.. .384
B. Tier 4 Status: 1984-2000.. .385
C. Application for Reinstatement to Tier 1…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Davis v. N.Y.C. Hous. Auth.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Dukes v. N.Y.C. Employees' Ret. Sys.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Bennett v. New York State Thruway AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Einsohn v. The New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Furman v. RichDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.