Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. City of Dayton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 2006No. 21072PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This case arises from a police pursuit that took place on August 16, 2002, at around 7:00 p.m., in the city of Dayton. At that time, the city had a policy prohibiting officers from becoming engaged in vehicular pursuits except in situations involving felonies, provided that “the felony for which the arrest is sought involved an actual or threatened attack against another person which the officer has reasonable cause to believe could result in death or serious bodily harm.”

{¶ 2} The pursuit policy was contained in Executive Order No. 5-2002, which was issued on January 18, 2002. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Colbert v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Haynes v. Hamilton CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of MassillonOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Argabrite v. NeerOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Chesher v. NeyerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Robbins v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. Sarah Wilson v. Eric GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API