Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank v. Wallis
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1895PublishedCited by 13 opinions
Appeal from circuit court, Kings county. Action by the First Rational Bank of Brooklyn against William T. Wallis and others on a promissory note. From a judgment entered on verdict in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.
This action was brought to recover against the appellants individually upon a promissory note, indorsed to the respondent by H. Stuetzer & Co., of which the following is a copy:
“$1,500. Jersey City, N. J., Dec. 2, 1892.
“Three months after date, we promise to pay to the order of H. Stuetzer & Co. fifteen hundred & 00/100 dollars, payable at First National Bank of Jersey City. Value received.
«Wm rn ITTnlUc TD^nl“Wm. T. Wallis, Prest. Geo. T. Smith, Treas.”
o. 1,027.
ndorsed: “Pay First Nat’l Bank, Brooklyn, or order. H. Stuetzer &
*383The note was given to Stuetzer & Co. for work done for the Wallis…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cobb v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Livingston v. BishopNew York Supreme Court · 1806
- Casco National Bank of Portland v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- First Nat. Bank v. StuetzerNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marcus v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Tew v. WolfsohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Bush v. GilmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Barrell v. NewbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
- Cherrington v. BurchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.