Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank v. Stuetzer
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from circuit court, Kings county. Action by the First National Bank of the City of BrooHyn against Herman Stuetzer and others on a promissory note. From a judgment entered on a verdict directed in favor of plaintiff, defendants Wallis and Smith appeal. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.
This is an appeal by the defendants William T. Wallis and George T. Smith from- a judgment entered against them and the other defendants. The action is upon a promissory note in the following form:
“$1,100. Jersey City, N. J., Jan. 20, 1893.
Wallis Aon Works.
“Three months after date, we promise to pay to the order of H. Stuetzer & Co. eleven hundred dollars, at the First National Bank of Jersey City, value received.
“William T. Wallis, President.
“George T. Smith, Treasurer.”
On the day of its date, the note was presented by the defendant Herman Stuetzer, one of the members of the firm to whom it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Casco National Bank of Portland v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Merchants' National Bank v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
3Cited by2 opinions
- First Nat. Bank v. WallisNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Tew v. WolfsohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902