Legal Opinion

Tew v. Wolfsohn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1902PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Henry Wolfsohn, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, •entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 23d day of May, 1902, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, overruling said defendant’s •demurrer to the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

.Latjghlin, J.:

The action is brought to recover damages for a breach of a contract alleged to have been made between the respondent and the appellant for an undisclosed principal, his wife the other defendant, by which the respondent, a professional singer, constituted the appellant his sole manager for America and Canada for a term of three months, and the appellant agreed to arrange a concert tour and to secure engagements for the respondent in advance, and to recover money advanced to the appellant by the respondent and also money received by the appellant for the respondent. The sole…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The New-York and New Haven R.R. v. . Schuyler, Cross, C.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Cobb v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Tuthill v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. McClure v. . Central Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Nichols v. . DrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Klinger v. Modesto Fruit Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Phillips v. RookerTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Joseph Denunzio Fruit Co. v. CraneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948
  4. Gay v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Hohauser v. SchorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API