Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Shure
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 2, 2015No. CIV. NO. 2:15-02110 WBS EFBPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Kenneth, R. Reynolds filed this action in state court against defendants Jennifer Shure, Benjamin Shure, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), and Brandon Doe arising from a dispute-over coverage under defendants Jennifer and Benjamin Shure’s insurance policy. Defendants removed the action to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b). Defendant State Farm now moves to dismiss plaintiffs claims for intentional infliction, of .emotional distress, trespass and conversion,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Airborne America, Inc. v. Kenway CompositesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Benjamin Miller v. Great West Casualty Company, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Bigge Crane & Rigging Co. v. Agri-Systems, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Yanez-Davison v. UPS, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025