Legal Opinion
Williams v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 14, 2025No. 2:23-cv-02585Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SAMANTHA WILLIAMS, No. 23-cv-02585-DC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 14 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., (Doc. No. 13) 15 Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the court on Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc.’s (“UPS”) motion 18 to dismiss. (Doc. No. 13.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending motion was taken under 19 submission to be decided on the papers. (Doc. No. 14.) For the reasons explained below, the court 20 will grant in part Defendant’s…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.