Legal Opinion

State v. Boley

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 2005No. 91,804PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

This case requires us to decide whether the State may, in its discretion, withdraw from a plea agreement when a case is remanded with directions to resentence the defendant to a lesser penalty based on the holding in State v. McAdam, 277 Kan. 136, 83 P.3d 161 (2004) (defendant convicted of manufacturing methamphetamine should have been sentenced to a severity level 3 drug felony rather than a severity level 1 drug felony).

As part of a plea agreement, Charles D. Boley pled no contest to one count of attempt to manufacture methamphetamine, in violation of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. GouldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Jolly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Scott BARRON, Jr., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. BunnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. MosherSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. State v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. Laymon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. State v. CopesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API