Legal Opinion
United States v. Baltimore & O. R.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1943No. 5031PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOBIE, Circuit Judge.
This is a civil action brought by the United States (upon the instigation of the Interstate Commerce Commission) against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (hereinafter called B. & O.) to recover penalties for alleged violations by B. & O. of the Flours of Service Act (hereinafter called the Act), 45 U.S.C.A. §§ 61-64.
The individual employees here in question were two extra yardmasters in the Westbound Yard of the B. & O. at Cumberland, Maryland. Most of the facts were stipulated, though some oral testimony was introduced at the time before Judge Coleman, sitting…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- United States v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of TexasDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1911
- United States v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Janet B. Jopek, of the Estate of Donald N. Jopek, Deceased v. New York Central Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Detroit, Toledo & Ironton RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962
- United States v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- United States v. New York Central RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1967
- United States v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949