Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Trotter
California Supreme Court
Decided August 17, 1931No. Docket No. Sac. 4472PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLUMMER, J., pro tem.
The three actions above named were tried together, and involve only one question, to wit, the ownership of a tract of land lying between the meander line and the waters of Clear Lake. The respective plaintiffs had judgment and the defendant appeals.
The actions were brought to quiet the title to lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of section 29, township 15 north, range 7 west, M. D. B. & M., abutting on Clear Lake, the plaintiffs alleging ownership to the actual water-line on the lake, irrespective of the meander line, as shown by the original survey of the property in dispute. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Mitchell v. SmaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Scott v. LattigSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Producers Oil Co. v. HanzenSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hirt v. EntusWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- United States v. Claude S. Gossett Et Ux., United States of America v. Charles D. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Troeger v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People Ex Rel. Department Public Works v. Shasta Pipe & Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.