Legal Opinion
Walter J. Schloss Associates v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 20, 1988No. 710, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Judge.
One hundred sixty years and two months after its creation by the Maryland Legislature, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (B & 0) went out of existence. It was merged into the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company (C & 0) which, for many years, had had a controlling interest in B & O. Appellants are former minority stockholders of B & O. Convinced that they were ill treated by B & 0, C & 0, and C & O’s parent company, CSX Corporation, they brought this action in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to enjoin the merger. Denied that relief, they sought to recover substantial…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Green v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Rabkin v. Philip A. Hunt Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Voeller v. Neilston Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Bayberry Associates v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Cohen v. Mirage Resorts, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2003
- Stepak v. ScheyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Fleming v. International Pizza Supply Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.