Legal Opinion

Truly v. Heuft

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 4, 2007No. 57899-5-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*915¶1 Ty Truly brought a residential unlawful detainer action against his tenant, Carmen Heuft, for nonpayment of rent. His summons stated that Heuft could respond by personally delivering her answer or notice of appearance to his attorney. His summons did not comply with recent amendments to RCW 59.18.365, which allow tenants to respond by mail or facsimile and include a sample summons form listing a tenant’s options for responding. Compliance with RCW 59.18.365 is jurisdictional. Although courts have allowed substantial compliance with “form and content” requirements, we hold that making the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Progressive Animal Welfare Society v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Foisy v. WymanWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. McGary v. Westlake InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF EVERETT v. TerryWashington Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Christensen v. EllsworthWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Laffranchi v. LimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Laffranchi v. LimCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. MHM & F, LLC v. PryorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API