Legal Opinion

Laffranchi v. Lim

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 18, 2008No. 60324-8-IPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.

¶1 This case presents the question of whether a tenant in possession of a residence following the sale of his landlord’s interest in it at a nonjudicial foreclosure sale is a necessary party to an unlawful detainer proceeding brought by the purchaser to obtain possession. We hold that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because a necessary party, a tenant in possession, was not made a party, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings as set forth below.

FACTS

¶2 Steven DeVore leased a four-bedroom house from Oscar Lim in the city of Snohomish in November 2006. The parties’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mt. Park Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. TydingsWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Munden v. HazelriggWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF CITY OF EVERETT v. TerryWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Snohomish County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. HOUSING AUTHORITY CITY OF PASCO AND FRANKLIN CTY. v. PleasantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. MHM & F, LLC v. PryorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. MHM&F, LLC v. PryorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. HOUSING AUTHOR. OF CITY OF EVERETT v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. Spokane Airports v. RMA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Housing Authority v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API