Christensen v. Ellsworth
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1
Fairhurst, J.
Petitioner, Ed L. Christensen, the lessor, seeks review of a Court of Appeals ruling that affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of an unlawful detainer action brought against respondent, Richard A. Ellsworth, the lessee. The trial court dismissed the unlawful detainer action because it found Christensen did not give Ellsworth the three day notice required by RCW 59.12.030(3). Whether the statutory notice was timely given depends on whether the time computation rule, CR 6(a), applies.
¶2 We hold that CR 6(a) does not apply to the calculation of the three day notice period required…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Cockle v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Cockle v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by179 opinions
- Jametsky v. OlsenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ErvinWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. ErvinWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- HomeStreet, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Putman v. Wenatchee Valley Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 2009
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.