Legal Opinion

PREFERRED SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Royal Garden Resort, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 20, 1990No. 23114PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

In this action between a construction lender (Preferred Savings) and a general contractor (Cianbro), the Court of Appeals held that Cianbro’s mechanic’s lien was invalid for failure to timely commence suit to foreclose. Preferred Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Royal Garden Resort, Inc., 295 S. C. 268, 368 S. E. (2d) 78 (Ct. App. 1988). We granted certiorari and now affirm.

FACTS

Cianbro entered into a single fixed-price contract with the owner (Royal Garden) to construct a condominium project, for which Preferred Savings was the lender.

The project was substantially completed by June,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Hotel MelroseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  2. Lowndes Hill Realty Co. v. Greenville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Preferred Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Royal Garden Resort, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Butler Contracting, Inc. v. Court Street, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Cianbro Corp. v. Jeffcoat and MartinDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1992
  3. Ferguson Fire & Fabrication, Inc. v. Preferred Fire Protection, L.L.C.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  4. Charleston Lumber Co. v. GPTCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Crystal Pools, Inc. v. Old Claussen's Bakery PartnersCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API