Legal Opinion

Charleston Lumber Co. v. GPT

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 21, 1991No. 1600PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Acting Judge:

Plaintiff, Charleston Lumber Company, Inc. (Mechanic) Appellant herein, brought this action against Defendant GPT, a Florida Partnership, Sol Proctor, as general partner (Owner) Respondent herein, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on property of the Owner. Mechanic was the only materialman which had perfected a mechanic’s lien at the time of the hearing. The trial court allowed the Mechanic only 35 per cent of its claim. The Mechanic appeals; we reverse and remand.

FACTS

The Owner of the property contracted with Metal Builders of South Carolina to construct a warehouse on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shelley Construction Co. v. Sea Garden Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  2. Lowndes Hill Realty Co. v. Greenville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. PREFERRED SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Royal Garden Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Clo-Car Trucking Co. v. Clifflure Estates of South Carolina, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Preferred Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Royal Garden Resort, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor, Cotton & Ridley, Inc. v. Okatie Hotel Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  2. Allendale County Bank v. CadleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API