Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Johnson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1938No. 5813PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

Respondents, by petition for a rehearing have prompted us to again examine the record with a critical eye, and we find some irregularities in the record of the proceedings in the trial court which make it advisable that we. take note of some of them.

It is first contended that Julia Hills Johnson, one of the defendants in the final determination of the cause in the district court, was not properly before the trial court, nor represented, nor served with notice of appeal. During the pendency of the action, J. H. Johnson, one of the defendants, died. Letters testamentary of his…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wellsville East Field Irr. Co. v. Lindsay Land & Livestock Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Bank of Vernal v. Uintah County(Two Cases)Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. In Re Drainage Area of Bear River in Rich CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Rich County-Otter Creek Irrigation Co. v. LambornUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Bowen v. TurgooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API