Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Turgoose

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 26, 1957No. 17,940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

*138In the trial court defendant in error was plaintiff and plaintiffs in error were defendants. We will refer to the parties as they there appeared.

Plaintiff sought an injunction to prevent defendants from placing bars, gates and locks on what plaintiff alleged was a public road running through lands owned by defendant Verva Bowen; he alleged that defendants had blocked and locked said roadway and denied plaintiff and the public the use thereof.

Findings of fact and conclusions of law were entered in favor of plaintiff and from the injunctive writ issued in favor of plaintiff, the deféndants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leach v. ManhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Sprague v. SteadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  3. Nicolas v. GrassleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  4. Dietemann v. People Ex Rel. BlackmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Hammond v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stanley Heights Property Owners Ass'n v. WhitesideSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Stanley Heights Property Owners Ass'n v. WhitesideSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API