Bank of Vernal v. Uintah County(Two Cases)
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
The Bank of Vernal, plaintiff, had judgment in both of these actions quieting title to four 40-acre tracts, of land.
Valborg B. T. Lowe maintains that she is not and never has been a party defendant and hence the judgment is void against her.
Defendant Paul Holger Lowe, her brother, asserts that the trial court erred in decreeing title to plaintiff, and rejecting his counterclaim by which he asserted ownership of the property by adverse possession.
The record clearly bears out the contention of Valborg that she was never made a party to the action. The Bank bases its contention…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- City of Oakland v. CarpentierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- South Tule Independent Ditch Co. v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Central Pac. Ry. Co. v. TarpeyUtah Supreme Court · 1917
- Cottrell v. PickeringUtah Supreme Court · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carter v. BectonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Pestal v. MaloneNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- WDIS v. Hi-CountryUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Baxter v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Carter v. BectonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983