Legal Opinion

Solis-Cohen v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 17, 1964No. Appeal, No. 251PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This is an appeal from the judgment of the court below denying appellant, a real estate broker, recovery of commissions he alleges were earned by him as agent for appellee.

Appellee, Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance Company (Phoenix), owns a building at 1007-11 Market Street in Philadelphia. Appellant as agent for appellee’s prime tenant, the John Irving Shoe Co. (Shoe Co.), obtained renewals of two pre-existing subleases and secured two new subtenants for the premises. As compensation for these services and for the collection of rents and management of the premises,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Royal Ins. v. BeattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Howell v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Seligson v. YoungSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Heymann v. Fourth Dickerson Building Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Malakoff v. Zambar, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. S. L. Nusbaum & Co. v. Atlantic Virginia Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1966
  5. Hahnemann Medical College & Hospital v. HubbardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API