Legal Opinion

Heymann v. Fourth Dickerson Building Ass'n

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1933No. Appeal 322PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

Charles Manzi employed the plaintiffs, real estate agents, to procure for him tenants for his real estate in the City of Philadelphia. Two leases, each for the term of ten years, were prepared and executed by the plaintiffs as agents for the owner and these were then ratified in writing by thd owner, the tenants taking possession and the real estate agents retaining possession of the lessor’s copies of the writings. This controversy arises ont of a provision in the leases, substantially the same in each, wherein it was provided that the real estate agents as a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Winnisimmet Trust, Inc. v. LibbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Landberg v. Equitable Investment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Isman v. HanscomSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Conley v. FineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
  5. Mutual Guarantee Building & Loan Ass'n v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Solis-Cohen v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Albert J. Grosser Co. v. RosenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. William I. Mirkil Co. v. GaylonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. William I. Mirkil Co. v. GaylonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API