Legal Opinion

Howell v. McCloskey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1953No. Appeal, 5PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

This is an appeal by the defendants from a decree in equity which required conveyance of four shares of stock to the corporation for cancellation or for equal division between the plaintiffs and the defendants, and declaring invalid the action of the shareholders and directors in amending by-laws and electing officers.

The defendant corporation was organized to carry on the business of a predecessor corporation whose assets and liabilities were acquired in 1947 through funds supplied by the plaintiff, Howell. All but six of its shares of stock were owned equally by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bailey v. JacobsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Durfee v. Durfee & Canning, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Lutherland, Inc. v. DahlenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Du Pont v. Du PontCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919
  5. Guppy v. MoltrupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Gleneagles Investment Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Chorba v. Davlisa Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Seaboard Industries, Inc. v. MonacoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Hahnemann Medical College & Hospital v. HubbardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. CST, INC. v. MarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API