Verdene Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
J. JONES, Justice.
This appeal arises from a long-litigated worker’s compensation case, but revolves solely around the issue of attorney fees. Claimant’s counsel, L. Clyel Berry, argues that he is entitled to a 40% attorney fee award, based on a contingent fee agreement he entered into with Claimant VerDene Page. The Industrial Commission, however, awarded Berry a 30% attorney fee award pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-804, which requires an employer to pay reasonable attorney fees when it unreasonably withholds compensation from an injured employee. Berry filed a timely appeal to this Court.
I
FACTS…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Van TineIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Rhodes v. Industrial CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- Clark v. SageIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Poss v. Meeker MacHine ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nelson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- Arreola v. Scentsy, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
- Warren v. Williams & Parsons PC CPASIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Leticia M. Salinas v. Bridgeview EstatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- Leticia M. Salinas v. Bridgeview EstatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.