Legal Opinion

Verdene Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 2014No. 40568PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

This appeal arises from a long-litigated worker’s compensation case, but revolves solely around the issue of attorney fees. Claimant’s counsel, L. Clyel Berry, argues that he is entitled to a 40% attorney fee award, based on a contingent fee agreement he entered into with Claimant VerDene Page. The Industrial Commission, however, awarded Berry a 30% attorney fee award pursuant to Idaho Code § 72-804, which requires an employer to pay reasonable attorney fees when it unreasonably withholds compensation from an injured employee. Berry filed a timely appeal to this Court.

I

FACTS…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Idaho State Insurance Fund v. Van TineIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Rhodes v. Industrial CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Clark v. SageIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Page v. McCain Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Poss v. Meeker MacHine ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Arreola v. Scentsy, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Warren v. Williams & Parsons PC CPASIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Leticia M. Salinas v. Bridgeview EstatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Leticia M. Salinas v. Bridgeview EstatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API