Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Union State Bank
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 26, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN B. SANBORN, District Judge.
On June Í, 1922, Arthur Evenson and Hjalmar Utterberg, copartners as Evenson & Utterberg, entered into a contract with the Independent Sehool District of Virginia to construct the Lincoln School at Virginia, Minn., for $123,500, to furnish and pay for the necessary labor and material, and to complete the building by January 1, 1923. On June 5, 1922, they furnished, with the plaintiff as surety, the requisite statutory bond for the performance of the work and the payment of all claims for labor and material. In their application to the plaintiff for the bond,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Standard Oil Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Board of County Commissioners v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- California Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of Detroit v. Federal Nat. Bank of ShawneeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Martin v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, a Corporation v. Line Materials Industries, a Division of McGraw Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Harvard Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.