Legal Opinion
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. v. Poor (In Re Poor)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine
Decided April 3, 1998No. 18-20673PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum of Decision
JAMES B. HAINES, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
Plaintiff, Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. [“Chase”], seeks summary judgment on Count I of its § 523(a)(2) complaint against pro se debtor Jeannie Poor. Chase asks that judgment be entered declaring that the obligations created by two transactions — a $3,400.00 balance transfer, and a $350.00 credit cash withdrawal — are excepted from Poor’s Chapter 7 discharge. It argues that the debts come within § 523(a)(2)(C)’s non-dischargeability presumption and that Poor has not effectively rebutted the presumption in her summary judgment…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McAlister v. Slosberg (In Re Slosberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1998
- National City Bank v. Manning (In Re Manning)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Chase Bank v. Brumbaugh (In re Brumbaugh)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Epstein v. Defilippi (In Re Defilippi)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2010
- In re PerronUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.