Legal Opinion

Moll v. Turnbow

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The defendants J. E. McCormmaeh and Wentworth & Irwin, Inc., appeal from the decree of the circuit court annulling and declaring void certain transfers of personal property connected with transactions between the appellants and the defendants F. W. Turnbow and Hazel Turnbow, his wife, as in fraud of certain creditors of said F. W. Turnbow, to wit: plaintiff C. A. Moll and interveners State of Oregon and Carl Detering, receiver of King Brothers, a corporation.

Prior to the institution of this suit C. A. Moll, on March 21, 1935, commenced an action against the defendant F. W. Turnbow to recover…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Weber v. RothchildOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Garnier v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Bond v. EllisonOregon Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Barr v. MintoOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Farmers' Nat. Bank v. RenfroOregon Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Murray v. WileyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hylton v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Clark v. Courtland Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API