Legal Opinion

Weber v. Rothchild

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1887PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah County.

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.

The objects of this suit -were, first, to obtain a dissolution of the marriage existing between plaintiff and the defendant Emil Weber, the care and custody of the children born of said marriage, alimony, and one third of the real property of the defendant "Weber; and second, to set aside and annul, as fraudulent, a certain deed made by the defendant Emil Weber to the appellant Rothchild, of certain property in Multnomah County. The deed included the house and lot in the city of Portland, where Weber and his wife had resided for a number of years, the furniture therein, and a piece of farm…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sims v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Zelnicker v. Brigham & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Tredwell v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  4. Zimmer v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  5. Moshier v. Knox CollegeIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Hendricks v. CallowaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Adams Oil & Gas Co. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Simpkins v. WindsorOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Murray v. WileyOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Adamson v. AdamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1975

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API