Legal Opinion

Garnier v. Wheeler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1901PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From Washington: Thos. A. McBride, Judge. Suit by Jean Baptiste Emile Garnier and others against Ira E. Wheeler and others. From a decree for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is a suit to set aside a deed as to a part of the real property conveyed thereby, and to subject such part to the payment of a judgment. The admitted facts are that the defendant Ira E. Wheeler executed to B. Phillips, August 19, 1893, three promissory notes, each for the sum of $200, payable in ninety, one hundred and fifty, and two hundred and ten days, respectively; that Wheeler was then the owner of the property so conveyed, which, on October 5, 1893, for the expressed consideration of $8,000, he conveyed to his brother, the defendant David R. Wheeler; that said notes were assigned…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bradtfeldt v. CookeOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  2. S. Marks & Co. v. CrowOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Jolly v. KyleOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Flynn v. BaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Philbrick v. O'ConnorOregon Supreme Court · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. HattremOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ball v. DantonOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Coffey v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Gray v. BeardOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Schwartz v. GerhardtOregon Supreme Court · 1904

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API