Jones v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice:
This is an appeal by defendants from verdict and judgment for defendants in the amount of $6,000. The matter arose as a result of a condemnation action brought by *663the Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority, plaintiffs, to acquire Lots 9 and 10 in Block 26, Park Place Addition, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, with a duplex house thereon, the house and lots being within the John F. Kennedy Urban Renewal Project No. Oklahoma R-3S. Both parties requested jury trial after court appointed commissioners had found that damage to defendants by taking in the condemnation action was in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McMillan v. Lane Wood & CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Eberle v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. RobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007