Legal Opinion

Jones v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 12, 1973No. 44542PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice:

This is an appeal by defendants from verdict and judgment for defendants in the amount of $6,000. The matter arose as a result of a condemnation action brought by *663the Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority, plaintiffs, to acquire Lots 9 and 10 in Block 26, Park Place Addition, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, with a duplex house thereon, the house and lots being within the John F. Kennedy Urban Renewal Project No. Oklahoma R-3S. Both parties requested jury trial after court appointed commissioners had found that damage to defendants by taking in the condemnation action was in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McMillan v. Lane Wood & CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Eberle v. State ex rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. RobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Cox Oklahoma Telecom, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API