Legal Opinion

Martin v. Atkinson, Warren & Henley Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1945No. 31661PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. HURST, V. C. J.,

The question presented is.whether the holder of á tax sale certificate may acquire title without serving notice of intention to demand a tax deed upon the owner of oil, gas and minerals and thereby extinguish the rights of the owner of such minerals and mineral rights. ■ ■

On June 8, 1926, the then owner conveyed to E. L. Cralle and C. L. Henley “ail of the oil and gas, and oil and gas rights and other minerals” in and under a certain 40-acre tract of land in Oklahoma county, in trust, however, for the Atkinson, Warren & Henley Company, a corporation. Later the trustees…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Cuff v. KosloskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Hudson v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Adams v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Foster v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walker v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Cornelius v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  3. Coates v. HewgleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Nilsen v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Nilsen v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API