Legal Opinion
Jamal v. Wilshire Management Leasing Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 10, 2004No. CV 03-0009-REPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
REDDEN, District Judge.
The matters before the court are (1) Wilshire Management Leasing Corporation’s motion for summary judgment on all of Kathleen Jamal’s claims; (2) Jamal’s motion for summary judgment on Wil-shire’s counterclaim for breach of Jamal’s confidentiality agreement; and (3) Wil-shire’s motion to strike the declarations of Pat Stoneking and Janice White that Jamal submitted in opposition to Wilshire’s motion. Oral argument was held May 28, 2004.
The Lawsuit
Jamal’s first amended complaint alleges four claims:
A. Age Discrimination.
Jamal alleges Wilshire violated…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Noga v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATIONDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2008
- Committe v. Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
- Committe v. Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLPDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Karthauser v. Columbia 9-1-1 Communications DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022
- Peterson v. Cascadia Senior Living, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.