Committe v. Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION BRUCE COMMITTEE, Case No. 3:18-cv-01013-AA OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff, Vv. MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN, LLP, and P.K. Runkles-Pearson, Defendants. AIKEN, District Judge. □ This matter comes before the court on plaintiff Bruce Committe’s application to proceed tn forma pauperis (“IFP”) (doc. 1) in this action against defendants Miller Nash Graham & Dunn (“Miller Nash”) and P.K. Runkles-Pearson, a partner at Miller Nash. For reasons set forth below, plaintiffs complaint (doc. 2) is DISMISSED, and plaintiffis granted…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.