Legal Opinion
Noga v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 9, 2008No. Civ. 07-847-ACPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ACOSTA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Christine Noga (“Noga”) asserts the following claims against Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”): gender discrimination under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2 and -3, and ORS 659A.030; age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 623, and ORS 659A.030; retaliation in violation of Title VII, the ADEA, and ORS 659A.030, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”). Costco moves for summary judgment on all claims. For the reasons that follow, Costco’s motion is…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sagers v. PanchanathanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023