Committe v. Miller Nash Graham & Dunn LLP
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION BRUCE COMMITTE, Case No. 3:18-cv-01013-AA OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff, v. MILLER NASH GRAHAM & DUNN, LLP, and P.K. Runkles-Pearson, Defendants. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge. This Court previously dismissed plaintiff’s complaint (doc. 2) for failure to sate a claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Doc. 9. In light of his pro se status, the Court granted plaintiff the opportunity to amend his complaint.1 Plaintiff then moved for reconsideration…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Raymond Watison v. Mary CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Mantia v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.