Legal Opinion

Rubio v. Swiridoff

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1985No. F003568PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RANDALL, J. *

We are faced in the instant case with the novel proposition that one who engages in a provocative quarrel with another and then drives rapidly away from the scene of the confrontation is liable in damages to the survivors of the victim of an automobile accident triggered by the other disputant who drove in a reckless fashion while influenced by the heat of passion thus enkindled. The legal rules we must apply to resolve the matter are well established, but we find no remotely similar factual precedent.

On October 29, 1981, plaintiff, through her guardian ad litem, filed a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Krieger v. Nick Alexander Imports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Saldana v. Globe-Weis Systems Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Hurtado v. Statewide Home Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Neinstein v. Los Angeles Dodgers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Charpentier v. Von GeldernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API