Legal Opinion

Neinstein v. Los Angeles Dodgers, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1986No. B018119PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, J.

Plaintiff Shirley Neinstein attended a baseball game at Dodger Stadium. She occupied a seat on the first base side in an unscreened area. During the course of the game she was struck by a batted ball. She subsequently instituted this personal injury action, 1 alleging that defendant was negligent in failing to protect her against such an occurrence. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. This appeal follows. We affirm.

The rules governing adjudication of a motion for summary judgment are well known. In making its determination, the trial court may…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Akins v. Glens Falls City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Quinn v. Recreation Park Assn.California Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Leo F. Piazza Paving Co. v. Foundation Constructors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Michael R. v. Jeffrey B.California Court of Appeal · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Price v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Merced Mutual Insurance v. MendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. King v. Kayak Manufacturing Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ordway v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API