Legal Opinion

Friske v. Hogan

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] As the intended beneficiaries under their father’s will, the children of Doug Friske (Friske children) brought an action against attorney Timothy Hogan (Hogan) alleging that he committed malpractice by failing to assure that the property identified in their father’s will was titled in a way to give effect to the proposed disposition of that property. The circuit court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the Friske children. We affirm.

Facts

[¶ 2.] Doug and Jeanne Friske each had children from prior marriages. In 2002, they hired Hogan to draft their wills and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flaherty v. WeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Schreiner v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  4. Matter of Estate of O'KeefeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Luther v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mazon v. KrafchickWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Perez v. SternNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Bennett v. GentileCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  4. Mazon v. KrafchickWashington Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API