Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Gentile

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 12, 2024No. 25/23Published

1Opinion of the Court

Madelyn Bennett, Individually and as Successor Trustee of the Pauline A. Bennett Revocable Living Trust v. Thomas A. Gentile, No. 25, September Term, 2023. Opinion by Gould, J. ATTORNEY MALPRACTICE – STRICT PRIVITY RULE The Supreme Court held that the strict privity rule set out in Noble v. Bruce,

349 Md. 730

(1998), is still good law. Applying the doctrine of stare decisis, the Supreme Court held that the strict privity rule applies in legal malpractice cases when a beneficiary under the inter vivos trust sues the attorney who advised a decedent in the estate planning context. ATTORNEY…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API