Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Tennessee Valley Authority

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 7, 1988No. Civ. A. 87-1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

Although cigarette packages have carried the Surgeon General’s admonition about the hazards of smoking for several decades, the effects of “passive” or “involuntary” smoking on nonsmokers have only recently been documented. 1 This lawsuit, filed by plaintiffs Anna and Ernest Carroll, seeks declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief for defendants’ failure to maintain a smoke-free work environment and for defendants’ response to plaintiff Anna Carroll’s concerns about her sensitivity to cigarette smoke. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss or, in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kalil v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  2. Caesar v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API