Legal Opinion
Caesar v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2003No. CIV.A.02-612(EGS)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Camille M. Caesar commenced a tort action against her co-worker, Ms. Patricia Robinson, in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. Both Ms. Caesar and Ms. Robinson are employed in the office of the General Counsel for the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Upon certification by the U.S. Attorney General that Ms. Robinson was acting within the scope of her employment at the time of the incident underlying plaintiffs claims, the Superior Court action was removed to this Court. Defendant now moves to dismiss…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Kalil v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- District of Columbia v. Jeppsen Ex Rel. MJDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Majano v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Zellars v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.