Richmond Wharf & Dock Co. v. Blake
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. William H. Waste, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff, as assignee of one A. S. Macdonald, sued for the value of the use of certain real property. There were five defendants, as indicated by the title of the cause. Judgment was recovered against Anson S. Blake, San Pablo Quarry Company, and San Francisco Quarries Company for $6,809.12 as the value of the use of said land. It was adjudged that plaintiff take nothing by the action from either of the other two defendants. The three defendants against whom the judgment was given have appealed, but the appeal which we are now considering is that of the quarry companies. The appeal of Anson…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Olson v. HuntamerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Baldwin v. BohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Parkinson v. ShewSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. GustafsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Samuels v. SingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Waranch v. Gulf Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Adams v. DurfeeMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Belakjon v. HilstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.