Bradley v. Chesebrough
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Muscatine District Oourt. — Hon. W. F. Bran-nan, Judge. Suit in equity to impress a trust on certain funds in the hands of the defendants, as assignees of a banking partnership known as A. A. Ball & Co., and for judgment for the amount of plaintiff’s claim. The trial court, denied the relief asked, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
1 2 From an opinion filed by the learned trial judge we extract the.follow statement of facts, that we find sustained by the record: “John C. Hormel, the decedent, it appears, died intestate on or about the nineteenth day of April, 1892. He was at the time of his death a resident of Johnson county, Iowa, and A. A. Ball, of the firm of A. A. Ball & Co., bankers at West Liberty, and the active business manager of said firm, was, by the last will of said testator, appointed executor. He accepted the trust, and duly qualified as such executor. The fund which it appears came into his hands, as…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matter of Cavin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- McLeod v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Nonotuck Silk Co. v. FlandersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Independent District v. KingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- State v. CadwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Empire State Surety Co. v. Carroll CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Officer v. OfficerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Lowe v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Whitcomb v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Leach v. Iowa State Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.