Friar v. Rae-Chandler Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polk District Court.- — Hubert Utterbaoe, Judge. Plaintiff seeks to disaffirm contracts for the purchase of several automobiles, entered into while a minor, and to recover the various sums paid therefor. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
i. infants: m-representation as to majority, I. Defendants, who are automobile dealers, admit the allegations of plaintiff’s petition: That, on April 8, 1917, he purchased a Chandler roadster automobile of them, for which he paid $1,300; that, during May, he traded the roadster to them for a Chandler touring car, paying a difference of $100; that, on or about June 17th, he traded the Chandler touring car to them, together with a Ford automobile of the value of $200, and paid a difference of $100 for another new touring ear; and that, about the middle of August, he purchased a new roadster,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Shryock & Rowland v. LatimerTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. DukesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Abel v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- First National Bank v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Hickey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sternlieb v. Normandie National Securities Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Martin v. Stewart Motor SalesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Martin v. Stewart Motor SalesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- Martin v. Stewart Motor SalesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955